Airbus A350XWB Family


#106

how many time did you spend searching for the info and pasting or tiping this topic, very nice job mate, really like this kind of topic...
Thank you

Lucas


#107

Thanks alot for the praise. I actually was in mood to search for the specifications. Hehe


#108

I love this plane! This is very much needed!


#109

Hopefully this one day comes........ in IF and in real life!


Source: https://flyawaysimulation.com/downloads/files/2041/fsx-qantas-airbus-a350-1000-xwb/


#110

It will come in IF, we just have to wait and be patient :)


#111

This is a need and do not say it is a copy of the dreamliner the a350 is 5 inches wider and the A350 will usually seat 325 while the 787 will typically seat 290 they are not equivelant the -900ulr has a range 9700 nm which can do sydney-london direct and the 787 can only do 8200nm the a350 is a must


#112

No worriries. The A350 is definitely a genuine aircraft. I'll explain later ;)


#113

Ooh nice image but that was the original concept a350, and has not reached production. A quantas a350 would be greatly appreciated though


#114

Correction: Qantas, not Quantas. Yes even airlines dont accept proper grammar! 😂


#115

I call hax. my keyboard is terrible but the overall point is correct


#116

No, The concept turned into the A350 we see today, and it has been approved that this concept was thrown into the shade.


#117

Only 21 more votes everybody!


#118

Till what? Will it magically appear on IF?


#119

Well everybody says that when a feature request hits 200 votes it is considered for the feature additions poll.


#120

Are you sure? Where did you find this information?


#121

Somebody told me this awhile ago...
But now that I think about it they were banned.


#122

Nope, not necessarily the case.


#123

Ok, thanks for the info!


#124

The A350 was considered on a poll but the DC10/MD11 won so that's not true at all. Vote for what you like, that's all there is to it!


#125

Yeah true, I just hope after the crj rework the A350 is added.
But anyways back on topic.